Download the Data files of NDP-087
CLIVAR CO2 SECTION A16S_2005
(11 JANUARY - 24 FEBRUARY, 2005)

Wanninkhof,
R., S.C. Doney, E. Peltola , R.D. Castle, F.J. Millero, J.L. Bullister, D.A.
Hansell, M.J. Warner, C. Langdon, G.C. Johnson, and C.W. Mordy.
2006. Carbon Dioxide, Hydrographic, and Chemical
Data Obtained During the R/V Ronald H.
Brown Repeat Hydrography Cruise in the Atlantic
Ocean: CLIVAR CO2 Section A16S_2005 (11 January - 24 February, 2005),
ed. A. Kozyr. ORNL/CDIAC-151,
NDP-087. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak
Ridge, Tennessee, 38 pp.
This report presents methods, and analytical and quality control
procedures for salinity, oxygen, nutrient, inorganic carbon, organic carbon,
chlorofluorocarbon (CFC), and bomb 14C system parameters performed
during the A16S_2005 cruise, which took place from January 11 to February 24,
2005, aboard research vessel (R/V) Ronald
H. Brown under the auspices of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA). The R/V Ronald H.
Brown departed
The data presented in this report include the analyses of water samples for total inorganic carbon (TCO2), fugacity of CO2 (fCO2), total alkalinity (TALK), pH, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), CFC, 14C, hydrographic, and other chemical measurements.
The R/V Ronald H. Brown A16S_2005 data set is available free of charge as a numeric data package (NDP) from the Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC). The NDP consists of the oceanographic data files and this printed documentation, which describes the procedures and methods used to obtain the data.
Keywords: carbon dioxide, total CO2, total alkalinity, pH, fugacity of CO2, carbon cycle, coulometry, potentiometry, hydrographic measurements, CLIVAR, Atlantic Ocean
The cruise of research vessel (R/V) Ronald H. Brown along section A16S from Punta Arenas, Chile, to Fortaleza, Brazil, was the second in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) -led contributions to a series of repeat hydrography cruises to measure decadal changes in circulation, heat and fresh water budgets, and carbon inventory in the ocean. The cruises repeat a subset of the World Ocean Circulation Experiment Hydrographic Program (WHP) and Joint Global Ocean Flux Study (JGOFS) lines occupied in each major ocean basin in the 1990s.
The WOCE/WHP program is driven by the need to monitor the increases in carbon dioxide (CO2) in the ocean and provide the necessary data to support continuing model development that will lead to improved forecasting skills for oceans and global climate. During the 1990s, the WOCE/JGOFS survey provided a full-depth baseline data set against which to measure future changes. By integrating the scientific needs of programs requiring measurement of the full water column, major synergies and cost savings are achieved. These measurements are of importance both for major research programs, such as Climate Variability (CLIVAR) and the U.S. Global Climate Research Project (GCRP) Ocean Carbon and Climate Change Program (OCCC), and for operational activities such as the Global Ocean Observation System (GOOS) and the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS). As outlined in the program documentation, one component of a global observing system for the physical climate/CO2 system should include periodic observations of hydrographic variables, CO2 system parameters, and other tracers. The large-scale observation component of the OCCC program has a need for systematic observations of the invasion of anthropogenic carbon in the ocean that is superimposed on a variable natural background. The five topical areas addressed by the CO2/CLIVAR repeat hydrography program are
1. carbon system studies;
2. heat and freshwater storage and flux studies;
3. deep and shallow water mass and ventilation studies;
4. calibration of autonomous sensors; and
5. data for model calibration.
A hydrographic survey consisting of a meridional lowered acoustic
Doppler current profiler (LADCP)/conductivity, temperature, and depth
(CTD)/rosette section in the western South Atlantic was carried out in
January - February 2005 (see also Wanninkhof and Doney, 2005 for additional
cruise details). The R/V Ronald H. Brown
departed
This data report focuses on the measurements of total inorganic carbon or dissolved inorganic carbon (TCO2 or DIC), fugacity of CO2 (fCO2), total alkalinity (TALK), pH, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), chlorofluorocarbons (CFC-11 and CFC-12), 14C, nitrate (NO3), nitrite (NO2), phosphate (PO4), silicate (SiO4), and dissolved oxygen (O2).
The methodology, instrumentation, and standardization of these parameters improved significantly during the WOCE/JGOFS era. Notable developments include release of manuals detailing the analytical methods and operating protocols (DOE 1994). Certified reference materials (CRMs) are now available for TCO2 and TALK, which are run interspersed with samples to determine calibration offsets. For this cruise, the TALK and TCO2 values were adjusted to account for the small difference between the CRMs run at sea and the certified value determined at Scripps Institution of Oceanography (SIO). The TCO2 coulometers were calibrated daily by injecting aliquots of pure CO2 (99.995%). The stability of each coulometer cell solution was confirmed with the analyses of several CRMs each day.

Fig. 1.1. Cruise track for the
Instrumentation has improved in the last decade. Alkalinity measurements can be done with better precision through automation and close checks of the response of electrodes. Burettes are independently calibrated, and the preparation of titrant (hydrochloric acid) has undergone improved quality control and standardization (Millero et al. 1998). Measurement of pH is now done with extreme precision with spectrophotometric methods (Byrne and Breland 1989). The TCO2 measurements are done by coulometry, a precise integrative method. During the A16S_2005 cruise two single-operator multiparameter metabolic analyzers (SOMMAs) (Johnson et al. 1999) were utilized for analyses, which facilitated a sample throughput of up to 80 samples per day. The fCO2 measurements were done with an equilibration system described in Wanninkhof and Thoning (1993). Oxygen measurements were performed by Winkler titrations (Carpenter 1965) with photometric endpoint detection (Friederich, Sherman, and Codispoti 1984).
The data underwent careful quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) both during and after the cruise. The precision of the measurements was determined from duplicate sampling and comparison of data from deep water, where little variability is expected. Outliers in the data were flagged based on several methods utilizing prior knowledge of the trends and known relationships between parameters. Depth profiles for each parameter were scrutinized for outliers. When deviations were observed, other parameters were assessed to determine whether they showed deviations as well. Inorganic carbon system parameters were linked through physical and chemical properties. In particular, if two of the four carbon system parameters are measured, the other two can be calculated, provided that the silicate concentration, the phosphate concentration, the temperature, and the salinity of the sample are known. These so-called internal consistency calculations were used to assess the difference between calculated and measured values. When the difference between the measured TALK and the TALK calculated from TCO2 and pH or fCO2 exceeded 10 µmol/kg, the three parameters were scrutinized and compared with other parameters to assess whether the datum should be labeled as questionable. Other techniques, described in detail below, include regional multi-linear regressions (MLR) between the inorganic carbon parameters and physical and chemical parameters known to correlate with them [for instance, TCO2 = f(T, S, AOU, Si, PO4)]. Again, the differences between measured and calculated parameters were inspected. Finally, the parameters were plotted against latitude for narrow depth intervals. Since changes along depth horizons are usually gradual, anomalies can be easily spotted and flagged.
This report describes procedures and methods for hydrographic measurement and the analytical procedures, calculations, and assessment of precision for nutrient, oxygen, TCO2, TALK, fCO2, pH, CFCs, 14C, and DOC measurements. A description of the QA/QC methods based on internal consistency of these parameters and the MLR technique is also provided.
The NOAA ship R/V Ronald H.
Brown, a state-of-the-art oceanographic and atmospheric research platform,
is the largest vessel in the NOAA fleet. With its highly advanced instruments
and sensors, R/V Ronald H. Brown
travels worldwide supporting scientific studies to increase our understanding
of the worlds oceans and climate. Commissioned on
|
Designer |
VT Halter Marine, Inc. |
|
Builder |
VT Halter Marine, Inc., |
|
Launched |
|
|
Delivered |
|
|
Commissioned |
|
|
|
R104 |
|
Call letters |
WTEC |
|
Home port |
|
|
Length |
83.5 m (274 ft) |
|
Breadth (molded) |
16.0 m (52.5 ft) |
|
Draft, maximum |
5.2 m (17.0 ft) |
|
Depth to main deck |
8 m (26.5 ft) |
|
Displacement |
3,250 tons |
|
Maximum speed |
15 kn (9 kn on one generator) |
|
Cruise speed |
12 kn |
|
Range |
11,300 nm at 12-kn speed plus 30 days on station |
|
Total crew and scientists |
58 |
|
Maximum cruise duration |
60 days (45 day practical limit) |
|
Science quarters |
Main lab: 1,730 ft2 Electronics/computer lab: 720 ft2 Wet lab: 230 ft2 Hydro lab: 700 ft2 Biochemical lab: 720 ft2 |
|
Ship name |
Ronald H. Brown |
|
EXPOCODE |
33RO200501 |
|
CLIVAR section |
A16S_2005 |
|
Ports of call |
|
|
Dates |
January 11 - February 24, 2005 |
|
Funding support |
NOAA, NSF |
|
Chief scientists |
Dr. Rik Wanninkhof, NOAA/AOML Dr. Scot Doney, WHOI |
|
Parameter |
Institution |
Responsible Investigator |
|
CTD |
PMEL/AOML |
G. Johnson/M. Baringer |
|
ADCP/LADCP |
UH/LDEO |
E. Firing/A. Thurnherr |
|
Salinity |
PMEL |
G. Johnson |
|
Nutrients |
UW/AOML |
C. Mordy, J.-Z. Zhang |
|
Dissolved Oxygen |
RSMAS-UM |
C. Langdon |
|
CFCs |
PMEL, UW |
M. Warner, J. Bullister |
|
Tritium, Helium |
LDEO |
P. Schlosser |
|
TCO2 |
AOML, PMEL |
R. Wanninkhof, R. Feely |
|
Discrete pCO2 |
AOML |
R. Wanninkhof |
|
TALK, pH |
RSMAS/UM |
F. Millero |
|
DOC |
RSMAS/UM |
D. Hansell |
|
CDOM |
UCSB |
N. Nelson/C. Carlson |
|
Underway pCO2 |
AOML |
R. Wanninkhof |
|
CO2 System Develop. |
USF |
R. Byrne |
|
14C, 13C |
WHOI |
A. McNichol |
|
PMEL |
Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory |
|
AOML |
Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory |
|
LDEO |
Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory |
|
RSMAS/UM |
Rosenstiel
School of Marine and Atmospheric Science, University of Miami |
|
UCSB |
|
|
UH |
University of
Hawaii |
|
USF |
|
|
WHOI |
Woods Hole
Oceanographic Institution |
|
UW |
University of
Washington |
Samples for CFCs, helium isotopes (3He), oxygen (O2), hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFCs), partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2), TCO2, hydrogen ion activities (pH), TALK, radiocarbon (Δ14C), tritium, DOC, chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM), particulate inorganic/organic carbon (PIC/POC), salinity, and nutrients were drawn in this sequence from a CTD sampling package containing thirty-six 12-L Bullister bottles. A detailed descriptions of methods for the CTD data, LADCP data and biooptical data are given in Wanninkhof and Doney (2005). Oxygen, nutrient, and salinity samples were taken from all bottles. Oxygen draw temperature readings were commenced after station 25. For the other parameters, not all stations or all bottles were sampled. The stations at full degrees of latitude (odd numbered stations) were generally completely sampled for CFCs, TCO2, pH, and TALK, with partial sampling for DOC and CDOM. The half-degree stations were partially sampled for HCFC, PIC/POC, CFCs, TCO2, pH, and TALK. Discrete pCO2 profiles were obtained at every two degrees. 3He, Δ14C, and tritium were sampled at different intervals (primarily at full-latitude stations).
A total of 4174 bottle salinity samples were taken during the cruise, of which 127 were flagged as questionable and 3 as bad. Two samples were lost during analysis. Samples were drawn from the 12-L Bullister bottles into 250-mL Kimax borosilicate bottles. The bottles were rinsed at least three times before being filled to approximately 220 mL. A plastic insert and Nalgene cap were used to seal the sample in the bottle. At the conclusion of sampling, the time was noted and samples were placed into the salinometer lab so they could equilibrate to room temperature. Samples were analyzed after a period of at least 10 hours and typically not more than 24 hours from the time of sampling. Samples were run on a Guildline 8400B Laboratory Salinometer, serial number 60843. The salinometer had been last calibrated at Guildline in January of 2004. IAPSO Standard Seawater was used to standardize the instrument. The software used (ASALW) was developed at Scripps Institution of Oceanography. As per the instructions provided in the software, the cell was rinsed at least two times with sample at a relatively fast flow rate; the flow was adjusted to a slower rate for the final fill, and a reading was taken. The cell was drained and slowly filled for a second reading. If the two readings agreed within 0.00005, the values were accepted; otherwise, an additional reading was required. PSS-78 salinity (UNESCO, 1981) was calculated. Corrections were applied to the data for differences between beginning and ending standards.
Samples for dissolved oxygen analyses were drawn from 12-L Bullister bottles into calibrated 140-mL iodine titration flasks using Tygon tubing with silicone adapters that fit over the petcock to avoid contamination of DOC samples. Bottles were rinsed twice and filled from the bottom, then overflowed three volumes (care was taken to avoid entraining any bubbles). One-mL of MnCl2 and one-mL of NaOH/NaI were added, then the flask was stoppered and shaken. Deionized water was added to the neck of each flask to create a water seal. The flasks were stored in the lab in plastic totes at room temperature for 12 hours before analysis. A total of 4659 samples were analyzed during the cruise, of which 37 samples were flagged as questionable and 4 as bad. Three samples were not reported. The whole-bottle titration technique of Carpenter (1965) was performed with modifications by Culberson et al. (1991), but with a more dilute solution of thiosulfate (10 g/L). Dissolved oxygen analyses were performed with a Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI)-designed automated oxygen titrator using photometric end-point detection based on the absorption of 365-nm wavelength ultra-violet light. The titration of the samples and the data logging were controlled by a 386 PC running the oxygen program written by Gernot Friedrich (Friederich et al. 1984). Thiosulfate was dispensed by a Dosimat 665 fitted with a 5.0-mL burette. The autotitrator and Dosimat performed well.
Dissolved nutrient (phosphate, silicic acid, nitrate, and nitrite) samples were drawn in 40-mL HDPE Boston Round sample bottles that had been stored in 10% HCl and rinsed four to five times with sample before filling. A replicate was always drawn from the deep bottle for analysis on the subsequent station. All samples were brought to room temperature prior to analysis. A separate analytical run was conducted at each station (except for the shallowest stations). An analytical run consisted of blanks and working standards, old working standards, deep water from the previous station, samples analyzed from deep to surface, replicate analysis of the four deep samples and any problem samples, and finally the working standards and blanks. The blanks were deionized water, and the standards were a zero standard in Low Nutrient Seawater (LNSW) and a high standard. Linearity of the autoanalyzer was checked every ten days, and corrections for non-linearity were applied during final data reduction.
All nutrients were measured using
automated continuous flow analysis with a segmented flow and colorimetric
detection. The four-channel autoanalyzer was customized using components from
various systems. The major components were an Alpkem 301 sampler, two 24-channel
Ismatek peristaltic pumps, four Thermo-Separation monochrometers, and custom
software for digitally logging and processing the chromatographs. Glass coils
and tubing from the Technicon Autoanalyzer II were used for analysis of
phosphate, and micro-coils from Alpkem were used for the other three analyses.
The detailed methods are described by Gordon et al. (1993). Because pump tubing destined for the cruise was lost in
transit, some of the pump tube sizes suggested in the manual had to be
modified. Pump tubes were changed four times during the expedition.
Silicic acid was analyzed using a
modification of Armstrong et al. (1967). An acidic solution of ammonium
molybdate was added to a seawater sample to produce silicomolybic acid. Oxalic
acid was added to inhibit a secondary reaction with phosphate. Finally, the
reduction with ascorbic acid formed the blue compound silicomolybdous acid. The
color formation was detected using a 6-mm flowcell at 660 nm. The use of
oxalic acid and ascorbic acid (instead of tartaric acid and stannous chloride
as suggested by Gordon et al.) was to
reduce the toxicity of our waste stream.
Nitrate and nitrite analyses were
also modified from Armstrong et al. (1967). Nitrate was reduced to nitrite in a
cadmium column, then formed into a red azo dye by complexing nitrite with
sulfanilamide and N-1-naphthylethylenediamine. The color formation was detected
using a 6-mm flow cell at 540 nm. The same technique was used to measure
nitrite (excluding the reduction step), but the color formation was detected
using a 10-mm flow cell at 540 nm.
Phosphate analysis was based on the
technique of Bernhardt and Wilhelms (1967). An acidic solution of ammonium
molybdate was added to the sample to produce phosphomolybdic acid, and this was
reduced to the blue compound phosphomolybdous acid following the addition of
hydrazine sulfate. The reaction was heated to 55°C to bring the reaction to
completion, and color formation was detected using a 10-mm flow cell at 815 nm.
Samples for TCO2 measurements were drawn according to procedures outlined in the Handbook of Methods for CO2 Analysis (DOE 1994) from 12-L Bullister bottles into 540-mL Pyrex bottles using Tygon tubing with a silicone adapter on the petcock to avoid contamination of DOC samples. Bottles were rinsed and filled from the bottom, leaving 5 mL of headspace; care was taken not to entrain any bubbles. After 0.2 mL of saturated HgCl2 solution was added as a preservative, the sample bottles were sealed with glass stoppers lightly covered with Apiezon-L grease and were stored at room temperature for a maximum of 12 hours prior to analysis.
TCO2 samples were collected at every degree from all depths (typically 36 for standard deep water stations) with three replicate samples. Some samples were also collected at every half-degree. The replicate seawater samples were taken from the surface, 1000 m, and bottom Bullister bottles and run at different times during the cell. The first replicate of the bottom water was used at the start of the cell with fresh coulometer solution, and the first of the 1000-m replicates was run in the middle of the cell after about 12 mg of C were titrated. The second one of the bottom replicates was run at the end of the cell after about 25 mg of C were titrated. A new coulometer cell was started with the second of the 1000-m replicates and the first of the surface replicates. In the middle of this cell, the second of the surface replicates was run and the first one of the surface duplicates of a partial station. The second of the partial station duplicates was run at the end of this cell. No systematic difference between the replicates was observed. There was no systematic dependency of results with an amount of carbon titrated for a particular cell. A total of 2482 samples for TCO2 were collected and analyzed during the cruise.
The TCO2
analytical equipment was set up in a seagoing laboratory van. The analysis was
done by coulometry with two analytical systems (called AOML-1 and AOML-2) used
simultaneously on the cruise. Each system consisted of a coulometer (UIC, Inc.)
coupled with a single operator multi-parameter metabolic analyzer (SOMMA) inlet
system developed by Kenneth Johnson (Johnson et al. 1985, 1987, 1993; Johnson
1992) now retired from Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL). In the coulometric
analysis of TCO2, all carbonate species are converted to CO2
(gas) by addition of excess hydrogen ion (acid) to the seawater sample, and the
evolved CO2 gas is swept into the titration cell of the coulometer
with pure air or compressed nitrogen, where it reacts quantitatively with a
proprietary reagent based on ethanolamine to generate hydrogen ions. In this
process, the solution changes from blue to colorless, which triggers a current
through the cell and causes coulometrical generation of
The coulometers were calibrated by injecting aliquots of pure CO2 (99.995%) by means of an 8-port valve outfitted with two sample loops with known gas volumes (AOML-1: 1.9951 mL at 25.05°C and 0.9807 mL at 25.10°C; AOML-2: 2.0018 mL at 25.09°C and 0.9949 mL at 25.06°C) bracketing the amount of CO2 extracted from the water samples for the two AOML systems.
The stability of each coulometer cell solution was confirmed three different ways: the Certified Reference Material (CRM), Batch 66, supplied by Dr. A. Dickson of SIO, was measured at the beginning and the middle, gas loops in the beginning and at the end, and the duplicate samples at the beginning, middle, and end of each cell solution (Fig 3.1., Table3.1.). The coulometer cell solution was replaced after 25 mg of carbon was titrated, typically after 912 hours of continuous use.
The pipette volume was determined prior to the cruise by taking aliquots at known temperature of distilled water from the volumes. The weights with the appropriate densities were used to determine the volume of the pipettes (AOML1: 28.716 mL at 20.00°C, AOML2: 22.547 mL at 20.00°C).
Calculation of the amount of CO2 injected was according to the CO2 handbook (DOE 1994). The concentration of CO2 ([CO2]) in the samples was determined according to:
![]()
where Cal. Factor is the calibration factor, Counts is the instrument reading at the end of the analysis, Blank is the counts/minute determined from blank runs performed at least once for each cell solution, Run Time is the length of coulometric titration (in minutes), and K is the conversion factor from counts to mol.
The instrument has a salinity sensor, but all TCO2 values were recalculated to a molar weight (µmol/kg) using density obtained from the CTDs salinity sensor. The TCO2 values were corrected for dilution by 0.2 mL of HgCl2 used for sample preservation. The total water volume of the sample bottles was 540 mL. The correction factor used for dilution was 1.00037. A correction was also applied for the offset from the CRM. This correction was applied for each cell using the CRM value obtained in the beginning of the cell. The results underwent initial quality control on the ship using property plots: TCO2 vs.Depth, TCO2 vs. Potential Temperature, TCO2 vs. AOU, TCO2 vs. NO3; TCO2 vs. SiO3, TCO2 vs. PO4, TCO2 vs. TALK, and TCO2 vs. pH. Also contour plots of TCO2 vs. LAT and Depth were used to analyze the quality of the data.

Fig. 3.1. Results of
the duplicate TCO2 samples collected during the R/V Ronald H. Brown cruise along the
|
Table 3.1. TCO2 duplicate measurement statistics |
|||
|
Measurement method |
Avg. |
Std. dev. |
No. |
|
Duplicate
samples measured back-to-back |
0.9 |
0.68 |
64 |
|
One duplicate
measured at the beginning; one at the middle of the cell |
1.0 |
0.82 |
62 |
|
One duplicate
measured at the middle; one at the end of the cell |
1.1 |
0.91 |
34 |
|
One duplicate
measured at the beginning; one at the end of the cell |
1.3 |
1.02 |
72 |
|
Duplicates run
on the same instrument but on different cells |
1.2 |
0.83 |
102 |
|
Duplicates run
on different instruments |
|
|
0 |
|
Duplicates
measured at the beginning of the cell, but not back-to-back |
1.3 |
0.89 |
6 |
|
Duplicates
measured at the middle of the cell, but not |
0.6 |
0.63 |
12 |
|
Duplicates
measured at the end of the cell, but not back-to-back |
0.7 |
0.98 |
4 |
|
Total no. of measurements |
|
|
356 |
The overall performance of the instruments was good during the cruise. The air purifier supplying carrier and pneumatic gas malfunctioned at station 24. Compressed tanks of ultra-high purity nitrogen gas were used thereon. At the same time, soda lime traps used to scrub any CO2 from the carrier gas were removed from the air/N2 line, since they developed cracks over time and also appeared to release CO2 in pulses into the carrier. A coulometer was replaced during the test cast runs. It did not find an endpoint and did not stop counting. A number of pinch valves failed and were replaced; some cell caps began to leak, and some electrode leads broke. Finally, the Orbo tubes (filled with silica gel to absorb possible acid vapors) tended to break and leak and were not used after station 109 on either system.
Due to concerns about the large amount of water used for a TCO2 sample and use of grease on the stoppers that could contaminate samples for dissolved organic matter (DOM), comparison tests were performed with samples drawn in 250-mL borosilicate bottles with ground glass stoppers stored under cold water with the regular sampling procedures outlined above. The results are shown in Table 3.2.
Table 3.2. Test results of different sample bottle sizes for TCO2
measurements
|
Type |
Bottle2 |
RT3 |
TCO2 µmol/kg |
Bullister Bottle No |
Volume (mL) |
Average4 µmol/kg |
|
CRM1 |
213 |
14 |
1971.11 |
|
|
|
|
bottle |
A9 |
13 |
2122.29 |
9 |
500 |
|
|
bottle |
C9 |
13 |
2121.10 |
9 |
500 |
2121.69 |
|
bottle |
S76 |
10 |
2119.95 |
9 |
250 |
|
|
bottle |
S77 |
12 |
2120.01 |
9 |
250 |
2119.98 |
|
bottle |
S78 |
12 |
2120.28 |
10 |
250 |
|
|
bottle |
S79 |
11 |
2120.89 |
10 |
250 |
2120.58 |
|
bottle |
A10 |
13 |
2121.04 |
10 |
500 |
|
|
bottle |
C10 |
12 |
2122.5 |
10 |
500 |
2121.77 |
|
bottle |
A11 |
12 |
2121.37 |
11 |
500 |
|
|
bottle |
C11 |
14 |
2123.05 |
11 |
500 |
2122.21 |
|
CRM |
213 |
15 |
1972.10 |
|
|
|
|
bottle |
S80 |
13 |
2120.74 |
11 |
250 |
|
|
bottle |
S81 |
19 |
2121.09 |
11 |
250 |
2120.915 |
|
bottle |
S82 |
11 |
2120.51 |
12 |
250 |
|
|
bottle |
S83 |
17 |