Comparison of the Carbon System Parameters at the Global CO2 Survey Crossover Locations in the North and South Pacific Ocean, 1990-1996
Feely, Richard A., Marilyn F. Lamb, Dana J. Greeley, NOAA, Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, Seattle, Washington; and Rik Wanninkhof, NOAA, Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory, Miami, Florida
Prepared by Linda Allison and Dana Griffith, CDIAC
ORNL/CDIAC-115 (1999) (http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/oceans/pmel/pmel.html)
As part of a collaborative program to measure global ocean carbon inventories and provide estimates of the anthropogenic CO2 uptake by the oceans, NOAA and DOE cosponsored the collection of ocean carbon measurements via the U.S. Joint Global Ocean Flux Study (JGOFS) Program. Investigators supported by these funding agencies collaborated to examine data collected during the World Ocean Circulation Experiment (WOCE) and Ocean-Atmosphere Carbon Exchange Study (OACES) cruises.
The Pacific Ocean cruises in this report occurred from 1990 through 1996 and overlapped in the North and South Pacific Ocean. Four parameters of the oceanic CO2 system from 30 crossover locations were compared to ensure that a consistent global data set emerged from the survey cruises. These parameters included dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), fugacity of CO2 (fCO2), total alkalinity (TALK), and pH, along with salinity and dissolved oxygen (O2).
The world's oceans, widely recognized to be the major long-term control on the rate of CO2 increases in the atmosphere, are believed to be absorbing about 2.0 GtC yr-1 (nearly 30 to 40% of the annual release from fossil fuels). Our present understanding of oceanic sources and sinks for CO2 is derived from a combination of field data that are limited by sparse temporal and spatial coverage and model results that are validated by comparisons with oceanic bomb 14C profiles.
The results from the Pacific Ocean cruises indicate that for DIC, fCO2, and pH, the agreements at most crossover locations are well within the design specifications for the global CO2 survey; whereas, in the case of TALK, the agreement between crossover locations is not as close.

kng 08/00